Why I’m withdrawing my support for the Cumbria coal mine
In my most recent column, I challenged those who condemned Cumbria County Council for backing a new coal mine, now I'm withdrawing my support.

In my most recent column, I challenged those who have condemned Cumbria County Council for backing a new coal mine, which would provide coking coal for steelmakers. There is no other way to run steel plants except with this fuel, so how else is steel to be made, I asked?
I received a vociferous response, informing me that I was wildly out of date about steelmaking. Arcelor-Mittal is Europe’s biggest steelmaker, and it already has a fully operational site in Hamburg which is able to make new steel using electric arc furnaces. Which can be fuelled by non-fossil fuels, and thus deemed to be deeply eco-friendly — unlike coal mines.
Apparently, China, where over half the world’s steel is now made, has just adopted a five-year plan to minimise the use of coking coal, and to depend upon electric arc furnaces to keep the furnaces burning. Similar investments are happening in South Korea and in Japan.
I stand corrected. There are obviously viable ways to make steel other than with coking coal. I have thought again, and withdrawn my tacit support for the new coal mine. And obviously so too should Cumbria County Council.
Recommended Reading

Are we overcomplicating the path to cheaper, cleaner energy?
Pulse Clean Energy’s Trevor Wills argues that the key to cheaper, cleaner power is deploying proven technologies at speed, not waiting for miracles.

Is grid connections reform finally fixing Britain’s queue problem?
Eclipse Power’s Laura Henry asks whether Britain’s grid queue overhaul offers real progress for developers facing tighter rules and uncertain dates.

Electrical Review to examine Britain's growing reliance on subsea electricity cables
Electrical Review is set to host a virtual Briefing on November 25, where it'll explore whether the UK is prepared to rely on a growing subsea grid.
