Why I’m withdrawing my support for the Cumbria coal mine
In my most recent column, I challenged those who condemned Cumbria County Council for backing a new coal mine, now I'm withdrawing my support.

In my most recent column, I challenged those who have condemned Cumbria County Council for backing a new coal mine, which would provide coking coal for steelmakers. There is no other way to run steel plants except with this fuel, so how else is steel to be made, I asked?
I received a vociferous response, informing me that I was wildly out of date about steelmaking. Arcelor-Mittal is Europe’s biggest steelmaker, and it already has a fully operational site in Hamburg which is able to make new steel using electric arc furnaces. Which can be fuelled by non-fossil fuels, and thus deemed to be deeply eco-friendly — unlike coal mines.
Apparently, China, where over half the world’s steel is now made, has just adopted a five-year plan to minimise the use of coking coal, and to depend upon electric arc furnaces to keep the furnaces burning. Similar investments are happening in South Korea and in Japan.
I stand corrected. There are obviously viable ways to make steel other than with coking coal. I have thought again, and withdrawn my tacit support for the new coal mine. And obviously so too should Cumbria County Council.
Recommended Reading

National Grid to use flexible demand to manage voltage in 100 LV zones
National Grid DSO is preparing to use flexible electrical demand to help manage voltage constraints on the low-voltage network.

Will commitment fees really solve the grid connection queue?
Equity Energies’ Elliott Meighan asks whether Ofgem’s new connection rules strike the right balance between readiness and financial strength.

Ofgem proposes £305m Sea Link allowance cut as harmonics issue remains unresolved
Ofgem has proposed cutting more than £305 million from NGET’s requested allowance for Sea Link, while raising concerns over a power quality issue.
